Jamey Tucker

Beside the Point

Archives

  • July 2018
  • June 2014
  • September 2012
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
  • March 2005
  • February 2005
  • January 2005

Blogroll

  • My Podcast
  • The Tech Guy
  • What the Tech

Powered by Genesis

for those of you without Shoptalk…..

May 20, 2005 by jameyt

A 19 year old college student wrote what should be a very revealing letter to the editor about the state of local news. “It is worthless” according to Andrew Barr.

The article which first appeared in the LA Times, says more about why local news is losing viewers than anything I have read in years. “I can call anyone, anywhere, on a cell phone. I can talk to my friends across the country online. I can find any information I want. I can watch anything I want. I can get news from any source I want. So, understandably, there is a reason why I do not watch the local news. It is worthless.”

“Content”, he writes “is an afterthought to most local news stations. Gimmicks can grab a viewer’s attention. Only content will keep him.”

Sadly, most of the news consultants and news managers who read this will disregard it.

They’ll let it go in one year and out the other because that’s what they’ve been doing for years.

I was in an editorial meeting once when a manager told the reporters and producers that “it doesn’t matter what we do to get them to watch, what’s important is that they watch.”

That may have worked for a while but not anymore. They’ve made their beds and now they’re sleeping in them.

Why won’t they listen to guys like 19 year old Andrew Barr?

jt

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)

Related

Filed Under: Misc.

Comments

  1. mike says

    May 20, 2005 at 9:52 pm

    Because it’s not about “news” it’s about eyeballs watching advertising. They don’t care how or why those eyeballs are there. Someone will eventually come along with a news source with television news’ reach and immediacy (broadband internet, most likely) and then the paradigm will change.

  2. Anonymous says

    May 22, 2005 at 4:14 pm

    Because,like you said They’ll let it go in one year and out the other because that’s what they’ve been doing for years“

Blogroll

  • My Podcast
  • The Tech Guy
  • What the Tech